Friday, May 22, 2009

The Lively Experiment is on life support

This story appeared in yesterday's Projo

"Cicilline bills would tax colleges and nonprofit institutions

01:00 AM EDT on Thursday, May 21, 2009
By Philip Marcelo

Journal Staff Writer

PROVIDENCE — Mayor David N. Cicilline, whose city faces a revenue shortfall approaching $50 million for the fiscal year starting July 1, unveiled two bills Wednesday that would allow municipalities to tax universities and hospitals.

One is the mayor’s much-discussed “student-impact fee,” which would assess private colleges a flat fee of $150 per semester for each full-time student who is from out of state.

The other would allow cities and towns to collect from large nonprofit institutions, such as major colleges and universities and hospitals, up to 25 percent of what the taxes would be on their tax-exempt properties.

The bill would affect nonprofit institutions that own property valued at $20 million or greater; the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence would be exempt, according to Cicilline. .."

FOR MORE CLICK ON Mayor David N. Cicilline and select May 21st story.


In my view this is just another short term fix for a structural long term problem. The lack of imagination and courage is the hall mark of the legislature. I personally think Cicilline's TAX on students is stupid and in the long run will be more expensive than than what it will generate in tax revenue (law suits and delays implementation), I must, however, congratulate him on stirring up the pot and showing the world just how bad things are here.


Our "lively experiment" has run its course economically. It is time for a new Green House Compact Summit.

Our business model, as a state, is built on the haydays of manufacturing and the labor movement with cheap labor and water power. Today this is no longer the reality.

Our defense industries were build on the WWII and the Cold War need for (submarines and ship building). These have changed to meet new conditions that require higher levels of skills and not just brut labor and craftmanship.

Our fishing industry was built on the abundance of fish stocks -- today they aren't there. Environmental and susrtainability issues are drawing in the net that fishermen find themselves in.

We need this debate, but we need to also move beyond it to find a new business model for the state built upon our true strengths and cutting our loses now, no matter how painful. It is only fair to the next generation.

The current adult generation(s) created this problem. Let's take responsibility and clean it up. It is in all our interests.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Operation Boot Straps??????

Here is an editorial focusing on the never ending battle within the Rhode Island political and business community about the economic planning goals for the state. The real problem it seems to me to be defining the ROLE of economic planning. When I returned to RI in the mid-1980's, the argument was being made that all we needed was to attract one or two big employers and everything be great. This point of view -- steal businesses from other states is a third world approach to development which major corporations might enjoy. But today we are not competing with our neighboring states. we are competing with the world.
The most practical approach to economic development is "self development." By that I mean, Rhode Island government should focus more on the human and creative talents of those here in the state as the engine for development than trying to manipulate the physical, fiscal, and political resources to attract outsiders.
Support for a larger number of small investments in start-ups and local growth companies have a greater probability of producing positive results than the same amount spent on one firm in the form of tax breaks and advantages. Even if the investment in the start-up and growth companies is in tax breaks and advantages, Rhode Island would be better off. Rhode Island would take part in the growth rather than buying into established mature firms with limited growth potential.
Providence Journal Editorial: Bigger than the EDC
01:00 AM EDT on Monday, May 4, 2009
In an impressively blunt report, a panel headed by Hasbro Chairman Alfred Verrecchia lit into the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation, calling its performance “fragmented, disjointed and without focus.” Mr. Verrecchia likened the state operation, which oversees a $5 million budget and employs 43 people, to a “basket of frogs,” exploding with energy but without direction.

True enough. Under Governor Carcieri’s helmsmanship, its last director, Saul Kaplan, spouted fashionable buzzwords while the state’s economy collapsed.

The panel recommended recruiting a new director (through a nationwide search) and creating a new private-public partnership to lure business to the state. These are good ideas. The EDC could perform a valuable role spreading the word about Rhode Island and making it easier for people to do business here, such as by speeding permit approvals when possible.

But, as many experts have pointed out, the big problem with Rhode Island’s economy is not something even a perfectly re-engineered EDC could fix. The Ocean State is a great place in many ways, with a superb location between Boston and New York, a strong quality of life (if you have a good job and/or a private income) and a hard-working private sector. But the state faces more than a marketing challenge, and until it solves some basic problems, the best economic development team in the world will not find much luck turning things around.

Rhode Island needs progress quickly in three areas:

•  Competitive taxes. The state will be hamstrung in attracting business while its taxes on businesses and executives remain higher than those in its neighboring states, never mind most of the rest of America. Federal taxes will have to rise to pay for new programs; indeed, fiscal prudence dictates that. But tiny Rhode Island is too small to go its own way. Businesses can fairly easily move to neighboring states. Making the state more competitive in taxes will require getting a handle on out-of-control public pensions, among other things.

•  Education reform. Rhode Island’s public schools are more expensive and perform worse than those of most states. For too long, they have been run too much for the benefit of such groups as teachers unions, and students have gotten short shrift. To attract businesses looking for a well-educated workforce, the Ocean State must reform its schools, encouraging innovation, accountability, management freedom to pursue best practices and greater choice for parents. The state’s public higher education has also gotten short shrift, even as administrative duplication among its three public colleges raises its inefficiencies and costs.

• Exploiting the state’s natural advantages. Rhode Island should be working vigorously to develop its maritime ports, which would create jobs and help businesses thrive by making it cheaper to transport goods. In addition, it should stop its foot-dragging on expanding the runway at T.F. Green Airport to permit European and West Coast flights. Politicians must develop the backbone to challenge the NIMBY forces that oppose job development and improved infrastructure.

Ultimately, these changes would make the state dramatically more attractive to job creators and even turn Rhode Island into a regional powerhouse. For too long politicians and their appointees have concluded that phrasemaking is enough — combined with tax and other incentives for favored industries, to be paid for by unfavored industries and individuals.

In truth, the economy is far too complex and innovation too quick for politicians to effectively choose winners and losers in the world marketplace. What a reformed EDC could do best is to show the rest of the world the Ocean State’s comparative advantages and urge policymakers to adopt programs that improve the state’s overall economic attractiveness.