Providence ranks 5th

 Thought you might like to know according to Yahoo

The 10 Healthiest Cities for Families in the USA

5. Providence, Rhode Island
This small, tight-knit community thinks big. Providence has as many playgrounds and ball fields as cities two to three times its size, plus its own top-notch children's hospital. The food scene is superb, with lots of mom-and-pop cafés in town, many serving up local seafood. "It's not unusual to see 3- Rhode IslanRhode Island; Providenced; Providenceand 4-year-olds digging into clams or shrimp here," says local restaurant owner Ellen Gracylyny, a mom of two. A recent perk: Farm Fresh Rhode Island, a group of 40 local family farms, has set up a "local food guide," which lists all the nearby farmers' markets, farm stands, pick-your-own farms, and community-supported agriculture programs. It also highlights restaurants and private schools that buy locally grown food.

R I Taxes -- Taking Responsibility

 As the election season heats up here in Rhode Island and the candidates stake out their positions and false promises, I find it interesting as each competes to become the new Wizard of OZ. They attempt to lull voters into their "vote" trap with the smoke of "political weed."  The smoke is the promises designed to cloud the mind of the voting public and to get their vote.


Of course, the average RI voter will take the promised bait and end up on the hook for the cost, one way or another. However, I think there is one candidate, Lincoln Chafee, who is being honest when he proposes how we might pay for those promises of jobs, etc. through a broader application of the sales tax, while at the same time lowernig the rate to 2%. At least, he has the courage to point out that "the king has no cloths." when it come to the annual budget deficit and is proposing a way to resolve the problem. 


A recent Projo a story, R.I. governor candidates trade promises at series of public forums, illustrates this point.


I have to agree with the Ethnographer's comment  that before you make promises, tell us how you will pay for it. Here is what Ethnographer had to say:

"Caprio will go out and get the money to repair the infrastructure. He is to be praised for focusing on infrastructure. Commerce in Rhode island is made expensive by the lack of good roads and dangerous/closed bridges. Commerce brings jobs. Go Frank.

However, how will he get the money? If there is no tax increase or tax restructuring to provide the money, are we going to borrow more?

Wouldn't the $75 million going to Studio 38 do more good fixing the Route 95 Pawtucket bridge rather than have business reroute their trucks around the bridge? This is a hidden tax on business and a deterrent to business coming into the state.

I'm glad to see Linc Chafee point out that you can't keep making promises and not pay for the promises. Linc is asking Rhode Islanders, all of us, to stop weaning and start thinking about the future of our children. That starts by addressing the problem of paying for our services as we go.

We (adults) made the problem by buying into the Democrat controlled GA mismanagement of the State budget. As responsible adults it is time to take personal responsibility and clean up the mess and not leave it to the next generation.

If taxes are too high, watch them go higher as we let the state's infrastructure rot away on empty promises."

When are Rhode Island voters going to overcome their denial? When are they going to recognize that there is a direct relation between the government services they demand and the taxes they need to pay to get them?


It is time for voters to give serious thought to the basic question: "What is the proper role of government?"  To answer this question they must answer three basic questions. "What do we need from government that we can agree upon? What can we afford? and, What are we willing to pay for (and what are we not willing to pay for) ?"


For example, is it fair to use public money to help the unemployed construction worker, who is a fellow citizens, by rebuilding our failing infrastructure; or is it better to invest $75 million in an outside private company with no product, no local employees and which could not convince private investors to fund it without a guarantee by the tax payers of RI?


Right now it seems Rhode Islanders want both, but Rhode Island can't afford both. The question before the local gubernatorial candidates is not "What can I promise you to get your vote?"


Rhode Island needs candidates who have the courage to explain honestly what choices Rhode Islanders face and what they will cost? Rhode Island needs candidates who are leaders with the courage to say "NO!" to ideas and practices that do not promote the common good. Rhode Island needs leaders who can help educate the public about the problems facing the State and explain what their real options are to solve these problems.


It is up to the voters to take responsibility and ask these questions of their candidates. If the voters don't or don't care, and if the media does not press the candidates for specifics, then Rhode Islanders will continue to get high on the political smoke  bleaching out of these want-a-be Wizards of Oz. And then the day after the election, the voters will wake up to the same old mismanaged reality they went to bed with..


The Rhode Island Voter should be asking themselves:

If I do not take responsibility or hold my elected representatives responsible for their promises, then WHO will?

Another perspective: Teacher and Public Employee Pensions

A major debate has been and continues to go on about the role of public service workers (government employee) pensions and the rebellion by taxpayers exemplified by the position taken by such groups as the Tea Party and RISC (Rhode Island Statewide Coalition). The underfunding (or legislative stealing) of the state and local pension funds by legislative and community governing bodies and poor (or blatant) mismanagement of such funds by the trustees of these funds  (such as West Warwick) has certainly added to the current and future fiscal problems facing the citizens of Rhode Island at all levels. These issues have been discussed here over the past year and more.

At times, the blame game become more the focus for debate, than any substantive discussion of solutions. Ideological battles between Unions verses taxpayers, legislatures vs taxpayers, citizens verses public employees, reactionary conservatives (know nothings) verses reactionary liberals (progressives) generate a lot of entertainment and media noise. But just as the BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico continues to waste millions of gallons of crude oil and natural gas and pollute the environment, the public treasury is still leaking and the state's fiscal future and public trust is being polluted by incompetent and greedy management.

Despite the debate and rancor at the State and community levels, we need to step back a little. The misbehavior which lead to the problem can be traced back to its source. That source is the general public, you and me, that is US, who through our uncritical support of our local elected officials have created a calcified legislature incapable of making the hard choices the times demand. We condemn the General Assembly but keep our own representatives who, when "they go along to get along," are not acting in our or the state's best interest.

Instead we elect representatives who can only make the easy choices, such as fireworks, cashing in the future earning from the tobacco settlement, approving budgets based on speculation about a federal bailout. The General Assemble has made short sighted and short term decisions over the past two decades that are today having real negative consequences, often unintended self inflicted ones.  Even those who promote such short sighted and selfish behavior are feeling the consequences today.

What are these consequences?

Every once in a while you run across an article, or posting, on the web that is worth sharing, especially in light of the issues confronting Rhode Islanders these days.  An article appearing on the Money and Market Website, entitled  State Pension Woes Only Worsening  by Nilus Mattive describes the significance of the public pension situation on the individual public employee who is, or has been "planning," for his or her retirement and expecting that the government will be able to keep its promise. After describing the sad state of affairs facing this public employee, he concludes with this warning.

I’ll Say It Again: Do NOT Count on Any
Government to Pay for Your Retirement!

As we go into this election year, it will be important that each citizen, each of us, consider the promises we made to state and local public employees through the actions of the legislators, council persons, and board members we elected to represent us. And especially those of you who are public employees, consider what the real consequences of your actions as a union member and as a taxpaying citizen have been. Consider where does your true enlightened self interest  rest. Consider what you have done to plan for your future and what you will do now. Consider what your chances are to retire with those rich pension deals negotiated at another time when we were all in a better place. 

The secret to life is change. The secret to success in life is the ability to change in response to a changing environment. Today, is the first day of the rest of your life, are you prepared to change?