Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts

Thursday, May 24, 2012

38 Studios - Crony Capitalism is alive and well in Rhode Island



The crisis at EDC and 38 Studio reflect the problem of crony capitalism at its best. Having written about this while the deal was being negotiated, I can't say that this comes as surprise.

The public's money should never be invested in a start-up in a mature market. All one is doing is buying out the original investors (the capitalist who are cashing in their investment) and replacing it with public money. This is what an IPO, such a Facebook, is supposed to do.


From an economic development perspective public investment should go to infrastructure improvements that will have a longer term value and benefit for the taxpayers and improve the environment into which private investors might decide to locate.


If anyone has been watching the market for video games, it has been shifting. As a start-up, it would make more sense if 38studio had been creating Game APPS for smart phones to reach a wider audience, quicker, at lower risk and cost and used the experience to work out the problems that come to all start-ups. Instead they went for the Big Hit with its high risk, high cost and, untested team.


The video game business is not a new business. It is a variation on the movie business as 38 Studios has claimed as the rationale for applying for the movie tax credits. The movie business isolates the product from the company by creating a corporation for the movie placing the risk in that company and still controlling the upside.


In 38 Studios we had a company with no product at the time of the deal. Today it seems that we may have a product without a company. Is the state considering putting a lien on the box game, to guarantee our investment?
 
Arlene Violet has her take on the situation  She points out that “As reported by Ted Nesi of Nest’s Notes on WPRI’s website, 38 Studios was removed from the list of companies scheduled to present at next month’s Electronic Entertainment Expo, a sort of World Series of offerings in the electronic game industry.” Such cut back in marketing effort is another sure sign that things are not right.

As for the tax credits if granted, they can be sold to raise cash, as the Projo’s story pointed out. But for the tax payers, those credits mean less tax revenue from whom ever buys and uses them. In turn, it means an additional RI tax payer contribution to 38 Studios on top the $ 75M loan guarantee.

Another problem is the potential loss of the human capital that we, as tax payers, have invested in to staff and provide the talent for 38Studios.
Now that the wounded animal has left blood in the water, the sharks have gathered to bite off the prime cuts (top talent). Will there be enough talent left if the funding situation can be resolved to have a company? And if not, can we still keep that talent here or will we be exporting it to Massachusetts?

38Studios is NOT GM. Its success or failure is NOT going to destroy the economy. One hopes that some investors will be found to refinance and restructure the company so that it is a success. Governor Chafee is to be commended for getting on top of the problem as quickly as he has in an attempt to protect tax payer interests and by being an active participant in the effort to find a solution to the problems.

But one also hopes that the blind, star struck, politicians in this state have learned something from this. And that lesson is that we, the tax payer, are paying them do their due diligence before throwing tax payer money at deals that no self respecting or even greedy bank would turn down.

Crony Capitalism and Sweetheart Union deals are the cause of our economic problems. I, for one, am happy to see that something is now being done to move us in a sane direction.

Monday, November 23, 2009

How the Governor opposes the Lively Experiment

Rhode Island was founded on the basic principle of a separation of church and state. This was, and is, the foundation for the Lively Experiment which is Rhode Island.

There is a supreme irony that Roger Williams who fled Massachusetts Bay Colony to avoid religious persecution at the hands of the Puritans and founded Rhode Island on this principle of separation, would find today that Massachusetts has taken the lead in recognizing the separation. Three years ago, Katie Zezima reported in the New York times: Rhode Island Couple Wins Same-Sex Marriage Case

Since then Rhode Island has yet to recognize the validity of any same sex union. It is both disappointing and insulting, as a Rhode Islander and a follower of Roger Williams' principle, to see the following headline in the national news.

R.I. Gov. Vetoes Same-Sex Funeral Rights, Bill Allows Same-Sex Partners Same Right as Spouses to Plan Funerals

There are strong religious arguments for and against homosexuality. But there is no justification for a political partisan state official to ban or support an activity by a citizen on solely religious grounds. This is especially true here in Rhode Island where the constitution and tradition are founded on acceptance and tolerance of diversity,

When the Governor, elected by all of the people, denies the basic civil rights of some of the people based on a personal religious prejudice, isn't he violating his oath of office. Or is he acting as a tool of a particular church or religious body? That is what Roger Williams fled from in the Bay Colony. Now RI gays must go to Massachusetts to find the freedom that Roger Williams sought to establish here.

In a time of economic crisis such as Rhode Island faces today, petty bigotry is not helpful in promoting economic recovery, nor creating a business friendly environment. Would the Governor ban an employer bringing in much need jobs from moving into the state, if he knew that the owners of that family business happen to be a committed gay couple?

Is there any difference here between "high taxes" and "don't ask, don't tell" as a disincentive to business. Isn't the very ownership of the "family" company placed in legal limbo, if one or the other gay partners die??

The purpose of marriage is twofold: Procreation and nurturing. Sex and sexual orientation apply only to the former. Humanity is the test for the latter.

Marriage is a religious and civil act. Let religion decide what the procreative purposes of marriage for its followers. But let's make certain that the State supports the social and public purposes of marriage as a nurturing institution for individuals regardless of their beliefs.

The Lively Experiment is based on the concept of religious liberty, or, in Roger Williams' terms, "soul liberty."